Notes on Tactics

A short site about chess. There is no shop, no email list, no affiliate links. Just notes from analysing for years and slowly becoming useful at the basic things — the kind of plain knowledge that gets buried under breathless beginner guides every time you search.

The point is not to teach chess from scratch in a single page. It is to give honest, practical answers to the questions a new hobbyist actually asks. tactics comes up the most. time management comes up next. The articles below take them one at a time.

Openings

Openings divides chess hobbyists into two groups: those who think it is the most important part, and those who hardly think about it at all. Both can be right. openings matters more in some styles of chess than others, and figuring out which camp you should be in is itself a useful exercise.

If you are unsure: spend two or three sessions explicitly focused on openings — pay attention, take notes, try small variations. If those sessions feel revealing and produce noticeable improvement, openings is probably one of your high-leverage areas. If they feel mostly redundant, you are likely in the camp that should focus elsewhere. Either answer is fine.

Studying

One of the under-discussed truths about studying is that the best practitioners often do less of it, not more. They learn to do the necessary part well and stop touching everything else. Beginners almost always over-handle studying — adjusting things that did not need adjusting, fussing with details that did not need attention, second-guessing decisions that were already correct.

If you find yourself fiddling with studying during a session, that is usually the moment to step back. Make one deliberate decision, commit to it, and see what happens. The discipline of leaving things alone is a real skill in chess and pays dividends across the whole practice.

Analysing Your Own Games

Analysing Your Own Games rewards small, frequent attention more than periodic deep dives. A few minutes spent on analysing your own games every day or two will, over a season, beat a single long weekend of intensive work. The skill builds in the gaps between sessions as much as during them — your brain processes what happened, and the next attempt benefits from that processing.

This is good news for busy adults. You do not need long blocks of free time to get better at analysing your own games. You need consistent short blocks. Ten minutes most days is more useful than three hours once a fortnight, and it is much easier to fit into a real life with work and other commitments.

Endgames

The most common question newcomers ask about endgames is some version of "am I doing this right?" The honest answer is usually "close enough, keep going." Endgames is not a binary skill. There are better and worse approaches, and there are catastrophic mistakes you should avoid, but inside that range any reasonable method that you stick with consistently will improve your chess steadily.

If you want concrete reassurance: work on endgames for a month, then look at your results from week one alongside week four. The improvement is almost always visible. If it is not, that is the moment to look hard at what you are doing and adjust — not before.

That is the short version. Chess rewards patience more than cleverness, and almost all of the visible improvement in the first year comes from showing up regularly rather than from any single decision about gear, method, or tactics. Most of what is on this site assumes the same thing: that you intend to keep at it, and that you would rather be quietly competent in two years than dramatically excited for two months.